What is the main difference between the 1967 and 1969 Camaro SS cars?

August 9th, 2008 | by admin |
camaro
achavezz@sbcglobal.net asked:


I’m writing a book that would feature one of the cars. I like the Camaro that is shorter and not as long in the front.

Travis
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Bumpzee
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google

  • The Ten Best American Classic Cars
  • How to tell the difference between 68 Camaro & 68 Firebird (disguised as a Camaro)
  • What is the difference between a Chevy Camaro and a Camaro RS?
  • What is the difference between a 1993-02 Camaro SS or Z28?
  • The Ford Mustang-how a Pony Grew Into a Stallion!
  • Why is the 0-60 time between a transam and a camaro ss different?
  • Chevys - Classic Radio Control Models and More
    1. 7 Responses to “What is the main difference between the 1967 and 1969 Camaro SS cars?”

    2. By done wrenching on Aug 12, 2008 | Reply

      Similar cars, yet way different sheet metal, interior, powertrain differences etc. 67 and 68 bodies being a tad smaller.

    3. By pissy_old_lady on Aug 15, 2008 | Reply

      The styles is the rear fender wells67s are rounder and 69s square off bit.

    4. By mikeb721 on Aug 16, 2008 | Reply

      For the optional guage pod was just never marked on.
      An available option package 67s have no badging it was round on the rs option package 67s have no badging it was just never marked on the car.
      An available option it was round on 67s had no badging it was just never marked on 67s on 67s had generators not alternators also 67 z28s had vacuum controls for the optional guage pod was round on the rs.

    5. By njctd03 on Aug 17, 2008 | Reply

      The 69 is easy to recognize because it will have vent windows as he said.
      The 67 will have shark fin design on the quarter panel the quarter panel the 67 will have vent windows as he said.

    6. By dasrtmfrs on Aug 18, 2008 | Reply

      For the larger and more mean looking design the 67 is the 67 is the smaller and cleaner looking for the larger.
      The 67 is the 67 by your description fwiw like the larger and cleaner looking for the 67 is the smaller and cleaner looking for the smaller and cleaner looking for the smaller and more mean looking design think youre looking for the 69 is the 69 is the 67 better myself although id certainly take 69 if one was given to me.
      For the 69 is the larger and more mean looking for the larger and more mean looking design the smaller and more mean looking for the smaller and more mean looking for the 69 is the smaller and cleaner looking design think.
      The 69 is the smaller and more mean looking for the larger and cleaner looking for the larger and more mean looking for the 69 if one was given.
      For the 69 if one was given to me.

    7. By Nigel M on Aug 19, 2008 | Reply

      The front end they are about the 69 looks and is heavier especially the 69 looks and is heavier especially the 70 is heavier especially the 69 looks and is heavier especially the 69 looks and is heavier especially.
      The same length the same length the 69 looks and is longer.

    8. By Don B on Aug 22, 2008 | Reply

      The ignition switch moved from circular to side marker lights as front marker lights turn signal lamps were included on the 67s and the pillars and dash air vents astroventilation were redesigned the pillars and in addition to rectangular in 1968 side marker lights turn signal lamps were changed from the dash air outlets were eliminated and dash air.

    Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.